Careers
Part of Independent references for link building: assets, outreach, and publisher choice
Link building checklist: a sign-off gate for each placement
A link building checklist for signing off each placement: classify the relationship, confirm payment and disclosure, check link treatment, record the decision.
What to take away
- Mark each gate pass, fail, unknown, or not applicable, with an owner, a date, and evidence. One fail blocks approval, whatever the pass count.
- Block a placement whose payment, sender identity, disclosure, or editorial independence cannot be explained.
- Keep one signed row per placement. The row documents a defensible process, not a promise of search credit.
A link building sign-off is the last review before a placement is accepted or left live. It asks one question: can the team explain why this reference exists and who benefits from it?
Gate 1: classify the relationship
Classify every placement as earned editorial, partner, user-generated, affiliate, sponsored, or other paid activity. The class decides which later gates apply, so an unclassified placement cannot pass.
Record money, products, discounts, reciprocal obligations, and any other material connection. Digital PR coverage gets the same classification as any other link, whatever the budget line says.
Gate 2: payment and disclosure
The FTC's native advertising guide says promotional messages are deceptive if they convey they are independent, impartial, or from a source other than the sponsoring advertiser. A paid placement presented as editorial fails this gate.
The FTC's endorsement guidance also says that responsibility for disclosing a material connection rests with the influencer and the brand, not the platform. Review the final public page, not only the campaign brief. Where the duty is uncertain, obtain legal review.
Gate 3: honest outreach and sender identity
Messages use honest identity, factual personalization, concise relevance, evidence, limitations, and no required anchor or coverage. A message that fails any of these makes the placement that follows suspect, even when the page looks fine.
Follow-up, suppression, privacy, data retention, and correction practices must be approved and followed. Ask for the thread, not a summary, so the reviewer can see what the publisher was actually told.
Gate 4: link treatment and excluded tactics
Paid placements use rel sponsored or another currently acceptable qualification, and user-generated links are handled appropriately. Confirm the attribute on the live page, because a brief can say one thing and the published page another.
The program excludes automated link creation, private networks, hidden placements, fabricated identities, and scaled anchor-controlled articles. Any one of these is a fail, not a score to average.
Gate 5: the destination supports the claim
Purpose and asset checks
- Named audience, market, and need
- Destination and qualified action
- Original utility and clear authorship
- Method, dates, definitions, limitations
- Licensing and update owner
- Loads, accessible, accurate claim
- Retirement or redirect plan
The destination must load, be accessible, and represent the claim accurately. A destination that cannot support the claim made about it blocks approval, however clean the relationship looks.
Confirm that it has a maintained retirement or redirect plan, as in content pruning, so the reference does not point at a dead page later.
Gate 6: agency, data, and vendor method
When an agency or subcontractor places links, document its methods, publisher fees, prohibited tactics, access, records, approvals, and exit procedures. A placement made by a method nobody can describe stays unknown, and unknown blocks approval.
Data handling and vendor history sit in the same review. The privacy and supply-chain background is context for the review, not local approval, so record who checked it and when. Reporting then follows the rules in SEO analytics.
Keep watching after approval
Approval is not the end of the review. The team monitors changed destinations, disclosures, qualification, redirects, page ownership, and expired domains, because a placement that passed on day one can fail later.
Changed destinations and broken redirects are among the technical SEO mistakes worth checking on a schedule. Neutral, rejected, and failed work should inform the next campaign rather than disappear from the record.
Record the decision
Recording the decision means one filled row per placement, signed by the owner. The sample rows below are illustrative.
| Source | Relationship | Payment | Disclosure | State | Owner | Date | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade publication features editor, name on file | Editor-initiated, no agreement | None | Not required, no material connection | Pass | Campaign lead | Sign-off date | Outreach thread, live URL, page screenshot |
| Broker-bought coupon placement | Paid, buyer-supplied anchor | Flat fee per placement | Missing on the live page | Fail | Campaign lead | Sign-off date | Invoice, page screenshot |
The second row fails twice: a buyer-supplied anchor and no disclosure. Correct or remove it, then record the new state. For the wider plan around these placements, see the strategy readiness checklist.
Common questions
What should block approval?
Block unclear payment, fabricated identity, deceptive personalization, missing required disclosure, manipulated editorial control, unsafe data handling, or a destination that cannot support its claim.
Can a high pass count offset one fail?
No. One fail blocks approval, so a percentage never hides one undisclosed or unsafe placement.
Does the checklist prove a link will improve rankings?
No. It records relationship context, compliance, link state, and ownership, not search outcomes.
